When the Supreme Court overturns rulings without offering any explanation, it is simply wielding raw power. And raw power ...

The Trump administration asked the justices to set aside an injunction blocking its layoffs of 1,400 Education Department ...

On Monday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) finalized 10,000 layoffs across federal health agencies, ...

The Education Department put arrangements to move some of its programs on hold while court battles over downsizing played out ...

The Supreme Court cleared the way for mass Education Department layoffs, bolstering President Donald Trump’s federal ...

Federal employees face unprecedented disruption with massive layoffs, mandatory office returns, and weakened job protections.

Supreme Court rulings and provisions in the recently-passed budget bill are bolstering the legality of the administration's ...

The Supreme Court allows Trump to proceed with Education Department cuts, a major shift impacting students, teachers, and ...

OPM’s guidance offers some leeway to the Trump administration’s policy requiring most federal employees to work in the office full time.

Many oppose the slashing of current government programs because the result is seen as unfair to government employees. They're wrong.

In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.