A new analysis breaks down the political implications of three proposed congressional maps that have been submitted to a Utah judge for consideration — one from Utah lawmakers and two from the plaintiffs in the ongoing redistricting lawsuit against the state.

The day after the Utah Legislature voted on its preferred congressional map as part of the state’s court-ordered redistricting process, plaintiffs in the state’s redistricting lawsuit filed a new complaint in court,

Republicans’ email campaign comes in the middle of the public comment period for Utah’s congressional maps, which is set to end on Monday.

The newly drawn district lines, designed to protect the state's all-Republican delegation in the U.S. House, still need court approval.

Utah’s Republican-led Legislature approved a revised congressional map Monday that could give Democrats an improved chance at flipping a seat as the party fights to topple the GOP’s slim majority in the US House.

Attorneys representing a group of landowners who oppose the West Hills township are asking Summit County Third District Court Judge Matthew Bates to decide whether the incorporation process violated the state Constitution before the proposal appears on the Election Day ballot.

Utah lawmakers adopted a new map for the state's congressional districts; opponents immediately proposed two alternatives. Here's why and what's next as consequential midterm elections get closer.

In Utah, Republicans passed a new U.S. House map that could potentially be used next year, as the current map was ruled unconstitutional.—Though the map Republicans passed retains four Trump-won districts,

Mormon Women for Ethical Government was one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit that could overturn Utah's Republican-leaning map for U.S. House seats. That could matter in next year's elections.